Chemical analyses of soils and other surficial materials of the
conterminous United States
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular data
Series_Information:
Series_Name: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report
Issue_Identification: 81-197
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Denver, CO
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Description:
Abstract:
This data set contains geochemical data from soils and other
regoliths collected and analyzed by Hans Shacklette and
colleagues beginning in 1958 and continuing until about 1976.
Geochemical point-symbol maps were plotted from these data and
published as U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 1270 entitled "Element
Concentrations in Soils and Other Surficial Materials of the
Conterminous United States". The samples were collected at a
depth of about 20 cm from sites that, insofar as possible, had
surficial materials that were very little altered from their
natural condition and that supported native plants. The sample
material at most sites could be termed "soil" because it was a
mixture of disintegrated rock and organic matter. Some of the
sampled deposits, however, were not soils as defined above, but
were other regolith types. These included desert sands, sand
dunes, some loess deposits, and beach and alluvial deposits that
contained little or no visible organic material. The samples
were chemically analyzed by a variety of techniques in the U.S.
Geological Survey laboratories in Denver, CO.
Purpose:
These data provide an ultra-low-density geochemical baseline for
soils and other surficial materials in the conterminous United
States. The data set contains 1,323 samples for a sampling
density of approximately 1 sample per 6,000 square kilometers.
The data set is currently the only national geochemical data set
collected and analyzed according to standardized protocols. The
data are most appropriately used to provide information on
background concentrations of elements in soil. The major
drawback with the data set is its extremely low number of samples
for the entire conterminous US.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1958
Ending_Date: 1976
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -125
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -67
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 49
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 25
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: soil
Theme_Keyword: soil geochemistry
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Categories
Theme_Keyword: geoscientificInformation
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: NGDA Portfolio Themes
Theme_Keyword: Geology
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: United States of America
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: None
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Smith, David B.
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Research Geologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing address
Address:
U.S. Geological Survey
Box 25046, MS 973
City: Denver
State_or_Province: Colorado
Postal_Code: 80225-0046
Country: United States of America
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 303-236-1849
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 303-236-3200
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:dsmith@usgs.gov
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
The soil samples were chemically analyzed by a variety of
techniques over a period of time from the mid-1960's to the late
1970's. Details of the methods are given in the references
listed in USGS Open-File Report 81-197 and USGS Professional
Paper 1270.
In summary, the methods used were:
1) Emission spectrography (Myers and others, 1961; Neiman, 1976) for Al, Ba, Be, B, Ca, Ce, Cr, Co, Cu, Ga, Fe, La, Pb, Mg, Mn, Mo, Nd, Ni, Nb, P, K, Sc, Na, Sr, Ti, V, Yb, Y, Zn, and Zr;
2) EDTA titration for Ca;
3) colorimetric methods for P and Zn (Ward and others, 1963);
4) flame photometry for K (Ward and others, 1963);
5) flame atomic absorption (Huffman and Dinnin, 1976) for Hg, Li, Mg, Na, Rb, and Zn;
6) flameless atomic absorption for Hg (Vaughn, 1967);
7) X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (Wahlberg, 1976) for Ca, Ge, Fe, K, Se, Ag, S, and Ti;
8) Combustion (Huffman and Dinnin, 1976) for total carbon; and neutron activation (Millard, 1975, 1976) for U and Th.
The accuracy varies with the analytical methodology and with the
concentration of the element being analyzed. A small portion of
the database contains qualified data. The types of qualifiers in
this data set are:
"N", meaning that the element was not detected at concentrations above the detection limit-this is shown in the data set as, for example, 5.000N meaning that the element was not detected at a concentration of 5 concentration units (ppm or %), the detection limit of the technique.
"L", meaning that the element was detected by the technique, but at a level below the detection limit-this is shown in the data set as, for example, 1.000L meaning that the element was detected by the instrument, but at a level that could not be quantified at or above the detection limit, 1 concentration unit.
"B", meaning that there is no data for that particular element in a given sample-this is shown in the data set as .0000B.
"G", meaning that the element was measured at a concentration greater than the upper determination limit for the technique-this is shown in the data set as, for example, 10.0000G, meaning that the element was measured at a concentration greater than 10 concentration units.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
USGS Open-File Report 81-197 gives analytical values for 46
elements analyzed by a variety of methods. For some elements, the
methods of chemical analysis were the same throughout the study,
while for others, the methods changed as analytical technology
improved. However, all the methods used were specifically designed
to give the total contents of the element analyzed. Therefore, the
results of earlier analysis should be comparable with results of
more recent analyses.
Completeness_Report:
Where chemical data is lacking for a given element in a given
sample, ".0000B" is shown as the concentration value. Virtually
every element in the data set has some samples in which the element
was not analyzed. This may have been a conscious decision on the
part of the investigators or it may have been the result of
insufficient sample to complete all the analytical procedures.
This lack of data is most common for the elements Br, C, Ge, I, Rb,
S, Sb, Si, Sn, Th, and U.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
Sample locations were determined from USGS topographic maps of
various scales. The sites are estimated to be accurate to the
nearest minute of latitude and longitude.
Lineage:
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The data were generated by the analytical laboratories of the
USGS over several years, beginning in the early-mid 1960's when
data were not stored in digital databases. In about 1980, upon
completion of the sampling and analysis, the data were
keypunched and stored in the PLUTO database. At about this
same time, the data were put into .CIM format. In about 1996,
a copy the data in .CIM was converted to .dbf format. In 1998,
the data in .dbf format was converted to Microsoft ACCESS
format (.mdb) and then to ARC-INFO format.
Process_Date: 1960 to 1999
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Point
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Entity point
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Geographic:
Latitude_Resolution: 1 minute
Longitude_Resolution: 1 minute
Geographic_Coordinate_Units: Decimal degrees
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1927
Ellipsoid_Name: Clarke 1866
Semi-major_Axis: 6378206.4
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 294.98
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Geochemical sample
Entity_Type_Definition:
Table rows consist of information about each sample and its
chemical composition.
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: Parts per million (PPM)
Beginning_Date_of_Attribute_Values: 195810
Ending_Date_of_Attribute_Values: 197611
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Smith, David B.
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Research Geologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing address
Address:
Box 25046, MS 973
Denver Federal Center
City: Denver
State_or_Province: Colorado
Postal_Code: 80225-0046
Country: United States of America
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 303-236-1849
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 303-236-3200
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:dsmith@usgs.gov
Distribution_Liability:
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides these data "as is". The
USGS makes no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of
information contained in the geographic data. The USGS further
makes no warranties, either expressed or implied as to any other
matter, whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of
the product, or its fitness for any particular purpose. The burden
for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ESRI shapefile
Format_Version_Number: 1.0
Format_Information_Content: Geochemical sample locations and analytic results