|Quadrangle map, 1:250,000-scale||NM|
|Quadrangle map, 1:63,360-scale||D-2|
|Nearby scientific data||Find additional scientific data near this location|
|Location and accuracy||The occurrence is on hill 375 about 1.5 miles west-northwest of the confluence of American Creek and Sinuk River. It is in the SW1/4 section 18, T. 8 S., R. 35 W., Kateel River Meridian. The location of this occurrence is taken from figure 3 of Mulligan and Hess (1965).|
This occurrence near lower American Creek was shown on figure 3 of Mulligan and Hess (1965, but no other data are available for this specific occurrence. It appears to be the northern-most of a group of iron-rich prospects that include NM014, NM017, NM018, NM019, and NM020. On the basis of data from the other prospects, this occurrence is probably a limonite (goethite) concentration in marble. The limonite can be massive to granular, botryoidal, mammillary, or fibrous in texture. The iron content ranges to as much as 59 percent (Eakin, 1915 [B 622-I, p. 361-365]). Hematite, pyrolusite, and calcite are present locally.
This occurrence and other iron deposits of the Sinuk River area are at or near the base of massive marble whose protolith is probably lower Paleozoic (Sainsbury, Hummel, and Hudson, 1972; Bundtzen and others, 1994). The deposits are locally controlled by high-angle faults or folds, but they are in general crudely stratabound within the basal massive marble or underlying calc-schist (Mulligan and Hess, 1965; Herreid, 1970). This stratigraphic interval also hosts base metal sulfide-fluorite-barite deposits at the Galena (NM130) and Quarry prospects (NM135).
The origin and age of the iron deposits of the Sinuk River area are uncertain. The deposits may be, in part, gossan developed on oxidized sulfide deposits (Eakin, 1915 [B 622-I, p. 361-365]; Mertie, 1918 [B662-I, p. 425-449]; Cathcart, 1922; Mulligan and Hess, 1965; Herreid, 1970). Several of the iron deposits, including American (NM014) and Monarch (NM017), are locally highly anomalous in zinc and lead. Arguing against a simple gossan origin is the paucity of diagnostic textures and structures in boxworks that would suggest derivation from specific sulfide minerals. Alternatively, these deposits could be hypogene iron oxide and carbonate deposits that are probably transitional into lead-zinc-barite deposits from the same approximate stratigraphic position, as at the Quarry (NM135).The age of the iron deposits of the Sinuk River area is most likely post-mid-Cretaceous because faults that crosscut mid-Cretaceous metamorphic rocks are an important control on them. A Late Cretaceous age for the iron deposits was suggested by Brobst and others (1971) because this is the age of fluorine-rich tin granites of northwestern Seward Peninsula (Hudson and Arth, 1983). The youngest possible age appears to be Early Tertiary, when deep weathering, sandstone-type uranium mineralization, and possibly karst formation occurred to the east in the Solomon quadrangle (Hudson, 1999).
|Geologic map unit||(-165.853738311831, 64.7920330769903)|
|Mineral deposit model||Carbonate-hosted, iron oxide deposit.|
|Age of mineralization||Late Cretaceous or Early Tertiary; post mid-Cretaceous metamorphism.|
|Alteration of deposit||Probable dolomitization and oxidation.|
|Workings or exploration||Some shallow prospecting pits may be present here.|
|Indication of production||None|
Brobst, D.A., Pinckney, D.M., and Sainsbury, C.L., 1971, Geology and geochemistry of the Sinuk River barite deposits, Seward Peninsula, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 750-D, p. D1-D8.
Bundtzen, T.K., Reger, R.D., Laird, G.M., Pinney, D.S., Clautice, K.H., Liss, S.A., and Cruse, G.R., 1994, Progress report on the geology and mineral resources of the Nome mining district: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, Public Data-File 94-39, 21 p., 2 sheets, scale 1:63,360.
Cathcart, S.H., 1922, Metalliferous lodes in southern Seward Peninsula: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 722-F, p. 163-261.
Herreid, G.H., 1970, Geology and geochemistry of the Sinuk area, Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Alaska Division of Mines and Minerals Geologic Report 36, 61 p., 3 sheets, scales 1:42,000 and others.
Hudson, T.L., 1999, Alaska Resource Data File, Solomon quadrangle: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-573, 360 p.
Hudson, T.L., and Arth, J. G., 1983, Tin granites of Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 94, p. 768-790.
Mertie, J.B., Jr., 1918, Lode mining and prospecting on Seward Peninsula, in Brooks, A.H., and others, Mineral resources of Alaska, report on progress of investigations in 1916: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 662, p. 425-449.
Mulligan, J.J., 1965, Examination of the Sinuk iron deposits, Seward Peninsula, Alaska, with a section by Hess, H. D.: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 8-65, 34 p.
|Reporters||C.C. Hawley and Travis L. Hudson|
|Last report date||10/22/1999|