Boss-Bixby

Deposit with commodities copper, cobalt, iron

More information at and near this site: Co-MO00014

About this location

Feature ID Co-Mo00560
Geographic coordinates -91.170418, 37.665829
Point definition Location of iron deposit
Reference Kisvarsanyi and Proctor (1967); Figure 1
Date: 1967; Scale: Small (<1:250,000)

Geologic information

Commodities copper; cobalt; iron
Valuable materials magnetite; hematite; cobalt-bearing chalcopyrite; bornite; native gold; sphalerite (1); cubanite (1); chalcocite (1); cobaltite (1)
Associated materials pyrite; monazite; sericite; molybdenite (1); galena (1); ilmenite (1); rutile (1); geikielite (1)
Mineralization style disseminated; breccia-fillings; fracture-fillings
Host rock age Precambrian (1)
Host lithologies syenite; rhyolite (1)
Alteration potassic; propylitic; hematitic; phyllic
Reference Nold, J.L., Dudley, M.A., and Davidson, Paul, 2014, The Southeast Missouri (USA) Proterozoic iron metallogenic province--Types of deposits and genetic relationships to magnetite-apatite and iron oxide-copper-gold deposits: Ore Geology Review, vol. 57, p. 154-171.
Additional references (1) Smith (1968)

Descriptions from sources

Geology

The Boss–Bixby deposit has been explored by over 100 drill holes, but lies under a cover of 350–400 m of Paleozoic sedimentary rocks and remains undeveloped. The deposit is a magmatic and hydrothermal iron–copper–cobalt–gold body that occurs largely within a highly altered, tabular syenite dike (Brandom, 1989; Hagni and Brandom, 1990; Kisvarsanyi, 1989), and is more closely related to the Olympic Dam IOCG deposit than any other Missouri iron deposit (Kisvarsanyi, 1989). The deposit consists of sulfide-bearing breccias, fracture fillings, and disseminations within the altered syenite dike and surrounding (intruded) trachytic and rhyolitic flows and tuffs (Kisvarsanyi, 1989). Possible structural control inferred by Kisvarsanyi (1989), involves a regional northeast-trending structural lineament that passes through the Boss–Bixby magnetic anomaly. Kisvarsanyi also noted that the boundary of the syenite dike is difficult to define because large-scale assimilation, partial replacement, and contact metasomatic alteration has strongly affected the rhyolitic host rocks. Hagni and Brandom (1988) reported that the mineralized syenite forms a body that is up to 1200 m in length, 180 m thick, and extends in depth beyond the deepest drilling at 1200m.

Nold, J.L., Dudley, M.A., and Davidson, Paul, 2014, The Southeast Missouri (USA) Proterozoic iron metallogenic province--Types of deposits and genetic relationships to magnetite-apatite and iron oxide-copper-gold deposits: Ore Geology Review, vol. 57, p. 154-171.

Deposit models and geoenvironmental models

Type Model Reference
Deposit model Iron oxide-copper-gold Nold, J.L., Dudley, M.A., and Davidson, Paul, 2014, The Southeast Missouri (USA) Proterozoic iron metallogenic province--Types of deposits and genetic relationships to magnetite-apatite and iron oxide-copper-gold deposits: Ore Geology Review, vol. 57, p. 154-171.
Geoenvironmental model Unclassified

Resource estimate summaries

Date Description Class Type Material Contained Units
1974 Resource ore iron 7,200,000(calculated) short tons
1974 Resource ore copper 330,000(calculated) short tons
1974 Resource ore cobalt 14,000(calculated) short tons

Detailed resource estimates

1974: Resource,
Year of estimate 1974
Resource description Resource
Material iron
Material type ore
Material amount 40,000,000(includes amounts of more than one commodity)
Amount units short tons
Grade 18
Grade units percent
Contained commodity 7,200,000(calculated)
Contained commodity units short tons
Material amount SI 36,300,000(calculated)(includes amounts of more than one commodity)
Material amount SI units metric tons
Grade SI 18
Grade SI units percent
Contained commodity SI 6,500,000(calculated)
Contained commodity SI units metric tons
Contained commodity element Fe
Short reference Long and others (1998)
Reference Long, K.R., DeYoung, J.H., and Ludington, S.D., 1998, Database of Significant Deposits of Gold, Silver, Copper, Lead, and Zinc in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-206A.
1974: Resource,
Year of estimate 1974
Resource description Resource
Material copper
Material type ore
Material amount 40,000,000(includes amounts of more than one commodity)
Amount units short tons
Grade 0.83
Grade units percent
Contained commodity 330,000(calculated)
Contained commodity units short tons
Material amount SI 36,300,000(calculated)(includes amounts of more than one commodity)
Material amount SI units metric tons
Grade SI 0.83
Grade SI units percent
Contained commodity SI 300,000(calculated)
Contained commodity SI units metric tons
Contained commodity element Cu
Remarks Supported by resource in Nold and others (2014)
Short reference Long and others (1998)
Reference Long, K.R., DeYoung, J.H., and Ludington, S.D., 1998, Database of Significant Deposits of Gold, Silver, Copper, Lead, and Zinc in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-206A.
1974: Resource,
Year of estimate 1974
Resource description Resource
Material cobalt
Material type ore
Material amount 40,000,000(includes amounts of more than one commodity)
Amount units short tons
Grade 0.035
Grade units percent
Contained commodity 14,000(calculated)
Contained commodity units short tons
Material amount SI 36,300,000(calculated)(includes amounts of more than one commodity)
Material amount SI units metric tons
Grade SI 0.035
Grade SI units percent
Contained commodity SI 12,700(calculated)
Contained commodity SI units metric tons
Contained commodity element Co
Short reference Long and others (1998)
Reference Long, K.R., DeYoung, J.H., and Ludington, S.D., 1998, Database of Significant Deposits of Gold, Silver, Copper, Lead, and Zinc in the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-206A.

History of the site

Dates Status Detail Reference
1943 to 1943 Exploration Magnetic anomaly discovered by Missouri Geological Survey Smith (1968)
1956 to 1956 Exploration Exploratory drilling Smith (1968)
1964 to 1964 Discovery Discovery of large copper-iron mineral deposit announced Smith (1968)

Geographic context based on the point coordinates