Castle Dome

Deposit with commodities copper, gold, silver, turquoise, molybdenum, rhenium

More information at and near this site: Re-AZ00020

About this location

Feature ID Re-Mo00277
Other names Pinto Valley
Geographic coordinates -110.964009, 33.410528
Point definition Approximate center of polygon
Polygon definition Quartz monzonite with greater than 0.4 percent copper
Reference Peterson and others (1951); Plate 3
Date: 1951; Scale: Large (>1:24,000)

Geologic information

Commodities copper; silver; gold; molybdenum; turquoise; rhenium (1)
Valuable materials Chalcopyrite; native copper; cuprite; gold; molybdenite; molybdite; chalcocite; native silver; turquoise
Associated materials Adularia; allophane; angelsite; apatite; azurite; barite; beidellite; biotite; calcite; canbyite; chalcanthite; chalcedony; chlorite; cimolite; clinozoisite; endellite; epidote; fluorite; galena; goslarite; gypsum; halloysite; hydrous mica; ilmenite; jarosite; kaolinite; leucoxene; libethenite; limonite; magnetite; malachite; metatorbernite; oligoclase; opal; orthoclase; pyrite; quartz; rutile; sericite; wulfenite; wavellite; zircon
Mineralization style veins; grains
Age of mineralization 59.1 Ma (2)
Host rock age Devonian; pre-Cambrian; Mesozoic; Tertiary
Host unit name Pinal schist; Martin limestone
Host lithologies quartz monzonite; granite porphyry; granodiorite; schist; limestone
Alteration propylitic; sericitized;sericitization; oxidation
Reference Peterson, N.P., Gilbert, C.M., and Quick, G.L., 1951, Geology and Ore Deposits of the Castle Dome Area, Gila County, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 971, 134 p.
Additional references (1) John and Taylor (2016); (2) Kirkham (2013)

Descriptions from sources

Geology

“The copper mineralization of the Castle Dome deposit is confined mainly to the quartz monzonite, which occurs in an uplifted block about 1 by 1.5 miles in size. The hypogene minerals consist of pyrite, chalcopyrite, and a little molybdenite, sphalerite, and galena, together with products of the hydrothermal alteration of the host rock. Pyrite and chalcopyrite are disseminated or occur in small, closely spaced quartz veins striking east-northeast and dipping steeply to the south.”; “The localization of the ore was due to the combined effects of three geologic controls: (1) zoning of the hypogene mineralization, (2) the rich hypogene mineralization associated with the diabase sills, and (3) supergene enrichment.”

Peterson, N.P., Gilbert, C.M., and Quick, G.L., 1951, Geology and Ore Deposits of the Castle Dome Area, Gila County, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 971, 134 p.

Deposit models and geoenvironmental models

Type Model Reference
Deposit model Porphyry Cu-Au John, D.A., and Taylor, R.D., 2016, By-Products of Porphyry Copper and Molybdenum Deposits in Verplanck, P.L., and Hitzman, M.W., (eds), 2016, Rare Earth and Critical Elements in Ore Deposits: Society of Economic Geologists, Inc., Reviews in Economic Geology, Volume 18, p. 137-164.
Geoenvironmental model Porphyry Cu du Bray, E.A., 1995, ed., Preliminary compilation of descriptive geoenvironmental mineral deposit models: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-831, 272 p.

Resource estimate summaries

Date Description Class Type Material Contained Units
1929 Reserve ore copper 320,000,000 pounds

Detailed resource estimates

1929: Reserve,
Year of estimate 1929
Resource description Reserve
Material copper
Material type ore
Material amount 20,000,000
Amount units tons
Grade 0.8
Grade units percent
Contained commodity 320,000,000
Contained commodity units pounds
Material amount SI 20,000,000
Material amount SI units metric tons
Grade SI 0.8
Grade SI units percent
Contained commodity SI 150,000
Contained commodity SI units metric tons
Short reference Peterson and others (1951)Page 64
Reference Peterson, N.P., Gilbert, C.M., and Quick, G.L., 1951, Geology and Ore Deposits of the Castle Dome Area, Gila County, Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 971, 134 p.

History of the site

Dates Status Detail Reference
1924 to 1941 Exploration Drilling Peterson and others (1951)

Geographic context based on the point coordinates