Tract ID | 142pCu8702 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Country | China | ||||||||||
Commodity | Cu | ||||||||||
Study area name | Central Asia Orogenic Belt | ||||||||||
Tectonic setting | island arc | ||||||||||
Deposit type | porphyry copper | ||||||||||
Grade-tonnage model | General porphyry copper model (Singer and others, 2008) | ||||||||||
Geologic age |
|
||||||||||
Identified Cu resources | 4,500,000metric tons | ||||||||||
Known prospects | 11 | ||||||||||
Mean Cu (t/sq km) | 179t/sq km | ||||||||||
Map scales used | 1M |
Assessment date | 2013 |
---|---|
Estimators | Alexeiev, D. (Russian Academy of Sciences); Bookstrom, Arthur A.(USGS); Frost, Thomas P. (USGS); Hammarstrom, Jane M. (USGS); Light, Thomas D. (USGS); Ludington, Steve (USGS); Mihalasky, Mark, J. (USGS); Panteleyev, Andre (XDM Geological Consultants) |
Assessment depth | 1km |
Quantitative assessment | Yes |
Number of deposits | Confidence level |
---|---|
2 | 90% |
4 | 50% |
14 | 10% |
14 | 5% |
14 | 1% |
Mean estimated deposits | 6.27 | ±4.58 | (0.73%) |
---|
Probability of mean | 0.33 |
---|---|
Probability of no copper | 0.04 |
Known deposits |
Total deposits |
Area (sq km) |
Deposit density per 100,000 sq km |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 8.27 | 111,687 | 7 |
Copper | 20,000,000 |
---|---|
Molybdenum | 110,000 |
Gold | 1,400 |
Silver | 6,700 |
Ore | 4,000 |
Confidence level | 95% | 90% | 50% | 10% | 5% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tonnage | 300,000 | 1,000,000 | 10,000,000 | 52,000,000 | 72,000,000 |
Fraser country | China |
---|---|
Fraser type | 0.52% |
Fraser high | 0.48% |
Typical cost | 0.52% |
High cost | 0.48% |
Infrastructure setting | Mixed |
Comments on depth | default |
Expected depth distribution | |
0 - 250m | 0.25 |
250m - 500m | 0.25 |
500m - 1km | 0.5 |
Economically recoverable resources | |
Copper | 12,000,000t |
Molybdenum | 48,000t |
Gold | 610t |
Silver | 3,700t |
Probability no econ recoverable | 0.23 |
Econ NPV | 3,300x $1M |
Exp dollars | 25.58x $1M/100,000 sq km |
Exp value class | Medium |
General | Mihalasky, Ludington, Hammarstrom, and others (2015) |
---|---|
Economic | Robinson and Menzie (2012) |
Name | Type | State | Country | Development | Details |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A're | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Changdagou | prospect | Sichuan | China | Prospect | Details |
Chundu | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Gaochiping | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Hongshan | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Langdu | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Lannitang | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Osaila | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Pulang | deposit | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Qiansui | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Songnuo | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Xuejiping | deposit | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |
Zhujiding | prospect | Yunnan | China | Prospect | Details |